<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Infrastructure and Platforms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://supernovahub.com/2010/05/infrastructure-and-platforms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://supernovahub.com/2010/05/infrastructure-and-platforms/</link>
	<description>Because Technology is Everyone&#039;s Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 02:21:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Harris</title>
		<link>http://supernovahub.com/2010/05/infrastructure-and-platforms/comment-page-1/#comment-1364</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 21:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://supernovahub.com/?p=1697#comment-1364</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see any call for regulation, onerous or not.  What I see is a description of something that has dogged the emergence of the internet for as long as it&#039;s been emerging.  This essay is an attempt to grapple with some of the basic definitional difficulties that plague us all when talking about &quot;the network.&quot;

In fact I see reclassification as a way to free broadband providers not just from regulatory burdens, but also as a means to provide regulatory certainty.  The ISP operators I talk and work with have stated many times that a particular regulation is not that big a deal.  What drives them crazy and threatens their existence has been the constantly shifting nature of the regulation over the past 15 or so years.  I mean for pete&#039;s sake, the Telecom Act of &#039;96 has been to the Supremes 3 times already.  It&#039;s a heckuva way to regulate an industry of such fundamental importance to us all (to paraphrase Justice Scalia).

I hope this process affords some certainty and of a reasonably long duration to afford certainty to an industry badly in need of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see any call for regulation, onerous or not.  What I see is a description of something that has dogged the emergence of the internet for as long as it&#8217;s been emerging.  This essay is an attempt to grapple with some of the basic definitional difficulties that plague us all when talking about &#8220;the network.&#8221;</p>
<p>In fact I see reclassification as a way to free broadband providers not just from regulatory burdens, but also as a means to provide regulatory certainty.  The ISP operators I talk and work with have stated many times that a particular regulation is not that big a deal.  What drives them crazy and threatens their existence has been the constantly shifting nature of the regulation over the past 15 or so years.  I mean for pete&#8217;s sake, the Telecom Act of &#8217;96 has been to the Supremes 3 times already.  It&#8217;s a heckuva way to regulate an industry of such fundamental importance to us all (to paraphrase Justice Scalia).</p>
<p>I hope this process affords some certainty and of a reasonably long duration to afford certainty to an industry badly in need of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Glass</title>
		<link>http://supernovahub.com/2010/05/infrastructure-and-platforms/comment-page-1/#comment-1237</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Glass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 15:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://supernovahub.com/?p=1697#comment-1237</guid>
		<description>Kevin, you&#039;ve long been an advocate of onerous and stifling regulation of the Internet, and here we see it again: you want to break it, artificially into layers (even though, in real life, many layers are rarely implemented separately) and then regulate the layers you wish to regulate.

Will real life Internet service providers -- those of us actually out in the field doing the hard practical work of hooking people up -- be represented in your session? Or will you include only those who agree with your hyper-regulatory approach? 

I challenge you to include some real life ISPs on the panel. Not lobbyists from big telephone companies who have never touched a Cat5 cable, but real ISPs like myself. You might then get a real world perspective on these issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin, you&#8217;ve long been an advocate of onerous and stifling regulation of the Internet, and here we see it again: you want to break it, artificially into layers (even though, in real life, many layers are rarely implemented separately) and then regulate the layers you wish to regulate.</p>
<p>Will real life Internet service providers &#8212; those of us actually out in the field doing the hard practical work of hooking people up &#8212; be represented in your session? Or will you include only those who agree with your hyper-regulatory approach? </p>
<p>I challenge you to include some real life ISPs on the panel. Not lobbyists from big telephone companies who have never touched a Cat5 cable, but real ISPs like myself. You might then get a real world perspective on these issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

